Legal Opinion

In Re Light Cigarettes Marketing Sales Practices Litigation

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 5, 2010No. MDL 1-09-MD-2068PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPLICATION OF THE COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL DOCTRINE

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

In her landmark 2006 opinion handing down a decisive victory to the Government over the tobacco company defendants, Judge Kessler described the litigation in United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. (DOJ):

The seven-year history of this extraordinarily complex case involved the exchange of millions of documents, the entry of more than 1,000 Orders, and a trial which lasted approximately nine months with 84 witnesses testifying in open court. 1

Judge Kessler’s exhaustive August 17,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Altria Group, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Philip Morris USA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Kenneth W. Martin v. John P. Malhoyt, John Doe(s) Shirley Ann Stevens v. David H. Stover, John DoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Canadian National Railway Co. v. Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
  2. Dorato v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  3. Shaffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
  4. In re Light Cigarettes Marketing Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  5. Bifolck v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API