Legal Opinion
Corbett v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided August 29, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.
Three separate actions are brought by plaintiff to recover upon three policies of life insurance issued to him by defendant. The policies are as follows: (1) No. 435434, issued October 1, 1923; (2) No. 440401, issued January 1, 1925; (3) No. 520984, issued July 23, 1927. The provisions of each policy, with respect to the payment of benefits in the event of total and permanent disability, are the same.
So far as material here, each policy, after making provision for payment upon proofs of death, further provides: “ and, under the provisions of section 21 hereof, the company will pay to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Perlman v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lyford v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Feinberg v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- Floyd M. Andrews, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Schollman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Levitt v. Prudential InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.