Legal Opinion
Columbia Chemical Co. v. Duff
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 24, 1911No. 33PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Action at law by Edward James Duff against the Columbia Chemical Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In the court below Edward J. Duff, a citizen of Great Britain, recovered a verdict against the Columbia Chemical Company for license fees for the use of four gas producers, alleged to be due him by a contract between them, dated November 28, 1903, which provided:
“The remainder of said amount, to wit, the sum of fifteen thousand five hundred dollars ($15,500.00), shall be paid to said grantor [Duff] by said licensees [the Columbia Chemical Company] in full as soon as the said four producers shall be completed and shall operate in the manner and with the results hereby…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- National Surety Co. v. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Potthoff v. Hanson & Van Winkle Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1907
- Columbia Chemical Co. v. DuffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co. v. ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
- The Material ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1934
- Federal Reserve Bank v. Ocean CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937