Legal Opinion

Potthoff v. Hanson & Van Winkle Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided June 6, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Ill Equity. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, District Judge.

The bill is founded upon reissue patent No. 11,624, issued August 3, 1897, to one Hans Alexander, assignor to Louis Potthoff. The original patent was No. 563,723. The defendants strenuously deny the title of the complainants to the reissued patent, and also its validity, both because of alleged irregularity in its issue and for want of invention in view of the prior art. As I íe*57-gard the case, however, it will be unnecessary to consider any of the defenses just suggested further than to say that, after a careful reading of the testimony relating to the prior art, it is…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferris, Receivers v. Jones, Adm'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Columbia Chemical Co. v. DuffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API