Legal Opinion

The Material Service

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 7, 1934No. 41349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODWARD, District Judge.

This is a petition for limitation of lia^ bility under sections 4283, 4284, and 4285'1 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (46 USCA §§ 183, 184, 185).

About 9 o’clock a. m. on November 30, 1930, a violent explosion occurred on the motor vessel Material Service,_ owned by libelant and petitioner, Leathern Smith-Putnam Navigation Company, a corporation, *1007while proceeding on the Sanitary Canal loaded with a cargo of gravel. As a result of the explosion the cook, Charles Embury, was so badly burned that he died five days later, and various members of the crew of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Commercial Union of America, Inc. v. Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Rose v. Stephens & Condit Transp. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1882

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. TCF Film Corp. v. GourleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  2. Wilson v. Ohio River CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1964
  3. Tcf Film Corporation v. GourleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API