United States v. Van Poyck
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT-MOVANT’S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION
HAUK, Senior District Judge.
This Amended Order supplants, and is a substitution for, this Court’s September 11, 1997 Order Denying Defendant-Movant’s Motion For Enlargement Of Time Within Which To File 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion.
INTRODUCTION
On February 11, 1994, Defendant-Movant Jeffrey Howard Van Poyck (“Defendant”) was convicted of two counts of armed robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113, and one count of conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 371. Shortly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Alvarez-Machain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Donovan v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Grayson v. GraysonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Rhodes v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Raynor v. DufrainDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Henderson v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.