Legal Opinion

United States v. Van Poyck

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 24, 1997No. CR-93-517-AAHPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT-MOVANT’S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION

HAUK, Senior District Judge.

This Amended Order supplants, and is a substitution for, this Court’s September 11, 1997 Order Denying Defendant-Movant’s Motion For Enlargement Of Time Within Which To File 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion.

INTRODUCTION

On February 11, 1994, Defendant-Movant Jeffrey Howard Van Poyck (“Defendant”) was convicted of two counts of armed robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113, and one count of conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 371. Shortly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Alvarez-Machain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Donovan v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Grayson v. GraysonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  3. Rhodes v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Raynor v. DufrainDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Henderson v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API