Legal Opinion

Ex parte Vaughan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1922No. 6719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, P. J.

By way of original application for writ of habeas corpus, relator calls in question the validity of his conviction for violation of an ordinance of the city of Dallas.

The complaint charges, in appropriate language, that he was the proprietor of a meat market and worked therein for more than five days “withoht a certificate from some reputable physician of the city of Dallas attesting that the bearer had been examined at any time within the last six months before the filing of this complaint and had been found free from infectious and contagious diseases.”

Many grounds are specified in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McKayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Ex Parte RoquemoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Ex Parte CoxCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Ex Parte GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex parte LargentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Ex parte HeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Ex Parte LuehrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Ex Parte LongCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API