Legal Opinion

Ex Parte G.H. Vaughn

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1922No. 6719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

By way of original application for writ of habeas corpus, relator calls in question the validity of his conviction for violation of an ordinance of the City of Dallas.

The complaint charges, in appropriate language, that he was the proprietor of a meat market and worked therein for more than five • days “without a certificate from some reputable physician of the City of Dallas attesting that the bearer had been examined at any time within the last six months before the filing of this complaint and had been found free from infectious and contagious diseases,”

Many grounds…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McKayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Ex Parte GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Hanzal v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Ex Parte RogersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex parte LargentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Ex Parte SpencerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Ex Parte LuehrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Ex Parte LongCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API