Legal Opinion

In Re Independent Counsel Starr

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided August 1, 1997No. LR-M-97-91PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILSON, District Judge.

Pending before the eight District Judges of the Eastern District of Arkansas is a second letter-complaint (Mandaniei II) by Connecticut lawyer Francis T. Mandaniei, alleging various conflicts of interests on the part of Mr. Kenneth W. Starr in his role as Independent Counsel in what is widely known as the Whitewater investigation.

Judge Elsijane T. Roy, Judge Henry Woods, Judge James M. Moody, and I have determined that we should recuse, for reasons set forth below.

In the Eastern District of Arkansas we have long assigned cases by random selection. It…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re: Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr, United States Department of Justice v. Francis T. MandaniciCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re: Allen W. Bird, IICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Mandanici v. StarrDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2000
  4. In Re: Allen W. Bird, IICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. In Re: Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr, United States Department of Justice v. Francis T. MandaniciCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API