Legal Opinion

State v. Lopez-Cruz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 3, 2013No. 08C51661; A144721PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant, who was convicted after a bench trial of one count of first-degree sexual abuse, appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in admitting an emergency room doctor’s diagnosis that the complaining witness had suffered “abusive contact.” He further asserts that his mandatory minimum sentence of 75 months pursuant to ORS 137.700 is unconstitutional as applied. We reverse defendant’s conviction, and therefore do not address the sentencing issue.

We state the necessary facts, including all reasonable inferences, in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Cervantes, 319 Or 121,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Ramirez-EstradaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. Mosqueda-Rivera-BurdetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. Mosqueda-Rivera-BurdetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. ConeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API