State v. Ramirez-Estrada

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree unlawful sexual penetration, ORS 163.408, and first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. He assigns error to the trial court’s admission of a nurse practitioner’s testimony that she found the child complainant “highly concerning for sexual abuse based on what [the child] had previously said *** [a]nd what [the child] told [her],” where there was no confirming physical evidence of sexual abuse. Defendant acknowledges that defense counsel did not move to strike the “highly concerning for sexual abuse” testimony after the witness offered…