Legal Opinion

Seward v. Dickerson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 20, 2002No. 1011359 and 1011447PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In Dickerson v. Deno, 770 So.2d 63 (Ala. 2000), we held that an agreement between Tonda Dickerson and her former co-employees to split the proceeds of a winning Florida lottery ticket was void under Alabama law. Edward Seward now challenges the validity of his gift of the ticket to Dickerson. The Mobile Circuit Court, in entering a summary judgment for Dickerson and the other defendants, rejected Seward's challenge. We affirm.

The underlying facts of this case were summarized in Dickerson as follows:

"The plaintiffs [in Dickerson] — Sandra Deno, Angie Tisdale, Matthew Adams, and Jackie Fairley…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Reynolds Metals Company v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Renfro v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waddell & Reed, Inc. v. UNITED INVEST. LIFE INS. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. White v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. IRIZARRY v. 3M COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2023
  4. Russell v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
  5. Seward v. DickersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API