Reynolds Metals Company v. Hill
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Reynolds Metals Company appeals from a class-certification order obtained by the plaintiffs in this case, who are former salaried employees of Reynolds ("the plaintiff employees"). We vacate the class-certification order and remand.
I. Facts and Procedural History
Jim W. Hill and Charles D. Harvey filed a class action on behalf of 279 former salaried employees of Reynolds who sought severance benefits when Reynolds sold the Reynolds Alloys Complex in Listerhill ("the Alloys facility") to Wise Alloys, L.L.C. ("Wise"). The complaint alleges breach of contract, fraud, and unjust enrichment.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. HeilmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Shaffer v. Regions Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Mantiply v. MantiplySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Fisher v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
- Labauve v. Olin Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2005
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.