Legal Opinion

Russell v. Ethicon, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 14, 2020No. 4:20-cv-00752Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION MELLISSIA RUSSELL, et al., ] ] Plaintiffs, ] ] v. ] 4:20-cv-00752-ACA ] ETHICON INC., et al., ] ] Defendants. ] MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is a motion for partial summary judgment and a motion to limit the case-specific testimony of an expert witness, both filed by Defendants Ethicon, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson (collectively, “Ethicon”).1 (Docs. 38, 40). Plaintiff Mellissia Russell suffered complications after a physician implanted in her a pelvic mesh product called Prosima, which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Hamilton v. Southland Christian School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API