Legal Opinion
IRIZARRY v. 3M COMPANY
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided June 22, 2023No. 8:20-cv-22444Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS Case No. 3:19md2885 EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Judge M. Casey Rodgers Irizarry, 8:20cv22444 Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon ORDER1 This matter is before the Court on Defendant 3M Company’s motion for summary judgment. See ECF No. 13. On full consideration, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. Legal Standard Summary judgment is appropriate where the record reflects there are no genuine disputes of material fact and the moving party is entitled…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.