Legal Opinion

State v. Wingo

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 11,013PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Vigo Criminal Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This is an appeal by the State upon questions of law reserved at the trial.

The appellee was charged in the indictment with the larceny of two mules from David Pugh. There was a trial by jury and a verdict of acquittal. The evidence is in the record, and shows, without conflict, the following facts:

In the spring of 1881 the appellee was in the employment of David Pugh, as a farm hand, and in hauling corn to market for Pugh, to Terre Haute; on the day of the alleged larceny, in March, 1881, Pugh sent him to that city with the two mules *205and a wagon loaded with corn, directing him to sell the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Keely v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Starck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Umphrey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Madison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bonahoon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ritter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Henry v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API