Legal Opinion

Starck v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

The appellant was indicted in the court below for the larceny of a heifer, and, upon trial, was convicted of the offence.

The facts appear to have been, that the heifer was a stray animal, that came to the premises of the appellant in the Spring of 1877, and herded to some extent with his cattle. He drove her away, but she came back, and he fed her with his cattle. Finally, in June of that year, he killed the heifer, and appropriated her to his own use.

There did not appear to have been any marks upon the heifer, from which he could have ascertained her ownership; nor did it appear that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  3. Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blackshare v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lamb v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State v. WingoIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Michigan Commercial Insurance v. WillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API