Prentice v. First Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Albert C. Hunt, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Roff against F. D. Prentice and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant named brought error. On death of plaintiff in error, cause revived in name of Donald Prentice, administrator.
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
Suit was filed on February 5, 1919, by the First National Bank of Roff, against F. D. Prentice, to recover on a promissory note, executed to Peter Deiehman by Prentice & Bell and F. D. Prentice. The defendant F. D. Prentice filed a motion alleging that the note sued on was the obligation of F. D. Prentice and Bailey E. Bell, partners, doing business as Prentice & Bell, and moved the court to make said firm of Prentice & Bell a party defendant. This motion was denied, and thereafter the defendant F. D. Prentice filed an answer and cross-petition, in which he alleged that the note was executed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. GleichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Horne v. Oklahoma State Bank of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Besse v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Delk v. City Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- NJ Mtge. and Inv. Corp. v. CalvettiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Burnham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Federal Surety Co. v. St. Louis Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Howard v. BiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Eastman Nat. Bank v. NaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.