Legal Opinion
Able v. Van Der Zee
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 1967No. Civ. 31958PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
Doctor B. Renault Able appeals from the order of the superior court sustaining without leave to amend the general demurrer of Zee Construction and dismissing Abie’s action. 1
Abie’s complaint alleges that he employed Cass Van Der Zee, doing business as Zee Construction (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Zee), to construct certain improvements on real property owned by Able. A dispute arose between the parties concerning the work and payment therefor, and on November 5, 1964, Zee filed an action in municipal court to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on the property. Able employed the services of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Hallett v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Schultz v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Dwan v. DixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Starbird v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Kahn v. BowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Joslin v. H.A.S. Insurance BrokerageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Barker v. HullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.