Legal Opinion

Joslin v. H.A.S. Insurance Brokerage

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1986No. E002333PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICKLES, J.

Plaintiffs Imogean Joslin and Roxie E. Dumas (mother and daughter) have appealed from a judgment of dismissal in favor of defendant H.A.S. Insurance Brokerage (hereafter H.A.S.) following the sustaining of H. A.S.’s demurrer without leave to amend. Plaintiffs had substituted H.A.S. in place of a fictitiously named defendant but the court ruled the action against H.A.S. was barred by the statute of limitations because plaintiffs “knew or should have known” the identity of H.A.S. when the complaint was filed.

The issues on appeal are whether the court properly took judicial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Smeltzley v. Nicholson Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Marina Tenants Ass'n v. Deauville Marina Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Munoz v. PurdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Gould v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Intengan v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Woo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API