Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1996No. 22063PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to suppress evidence. The defendant alleges that the challenged evidence was the product of his illegal detention and an illegal search of his automobile. We conclude that the detention and search were lawful, and therefore affirm the district court’s order.

I. FACTS

The following facts are drawn from the district court’s findings following an evidentiary hearing on Martinez’s motion to suppress evidence. On November 1, 1994, Agent Scott Baker of the United States Border Patrol was driving on Interstate 84 when he observed Hector…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. State v. ParkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. ScheetzMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API