Legal Opinion

People v. Strobridge

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1983No. Docket 56815PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals by leave granted from his conviction of keeping more than three dogs on his premises without a kennel license in violation of Grandville ordinances, § 21, No 159-A.

The defendant owns a parcel of land in the City of Grandville. On August 9, 1979, Officer Milton Zaagman, an animal control officer with the Wyoming Police Department, visited defendant and noticed that six adult dogs were present at his residence. The defendant did not have a kennel license. Section 21 of the above-cited ordinance provides in pertinent part that "[n]o person shall keep or allow more than 3 dogs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grocers Dairy Co. v. Department of Agriculture DirectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Norton Shores v. CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Penner v. Seaway HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Renne v. Waterford TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King Enterprises, Inc. v. Thomas TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  2. People v. HoganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Holt v. City of Sauk RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Natural Aggregates Corp. v. Brighton TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Little MacK Entertainment II, Inc. v. Township of MarengoDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API