Legal Opinion

King Enterprises, Inc. v. Thomas Township

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 24, 2002No. 01-10242-BCPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAWSON, District Judge.

In 1999, the defendant, Thomas Township, enacted a comprehensive ordinance which was intended to regulate “the construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, size, location, and number of signs” that property owners may construct or display on their land within each of five zoning districts in the Township. Thomas Township Ordinance 99-G-18 § 13-1-1 (hereinafter “Ord. § 13-1-1”). The plaintiffs, who include business owners and operators and residents of the Township, contend that the ordinance…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jocham v. Tuscola CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  2. Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Mount Pleasant Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  3. Karhani v. MeijerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. Goedert v. City of FerndaleDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  5. Lamar Advertising Co. v. Township of ElmiraDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API