Legal Opinion
P & Z CO., INC. v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 1979No. 12771PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
Appellants seek review of their misdemeanor convictions for failing to report employee injuries as required by D.C.Code 1973, § 36-438(c) (the D.C. Industrial Safety Act). 1 They argue that the D.C. statute is inoperative because it was preempted by congressional passage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA). 2 We affirm the trial court’s determination that OSHA did not invalidate the reporting requirement of the D.C. Industrial Safety Act.
D.C.Code 1973, § 36-438(c) requires employers to submit to the Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board copies of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. United Continental Tuna Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Max R. Kargman v. Thomas A. Sullivan, Bertram A. Druker v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n v. KillianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Traudt v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Dukes v. Sirius Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- Mohan v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.