Legal Opinion

Max R. Kargman v. Thomas A. Sullivan, Bertram A. Druker v. City of Boston

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 15, 1977No. 76-1304 to 76-1307PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Chief Judge.

The major legal problem in this case is to try to fit the fact that owners of four federally subsidized low and middle income housing projects in Boston have to satisfy both federal and municipal authorities as to the reasonableness of their rents within the doctrinal pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Supremacy Clause decisions. This requires us to review the record as to the impact on plaintiffs of the procedures and decisions of the Boston Rent Board in reviewing requests for rental increases and to determine whether the district court’s conclusion that “an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc. v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Franklin Tower One, L.L.C. v. N.M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. McIntosh v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Barbara Falzarano v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. Christopher Village, Ltd. Partnership v. RetsinasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API