Legal Opinion
Budik v. Department of the Army
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2010No. Civil Action 09-01518 (CKK)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
In this action brought pro se under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, Plaintiff Edith M. Budik, M.D. (“Plaintiff’) challenges the responses of Defendant Department of the Army (“Defendant”) to her requests for information relating to her former employment at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (“LRMC”). Specifically, at issue in this action are two separate FOIA requests lodged by Plaintiff with Defendant in August and September 2008. 1 Initially, Plaintiff sought a single document relating to her performance while…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Beltranena v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Quick v. United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards & TechnologyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Schoenman v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.