United States v. Neuman & Schwiers Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMartiN, Presiding Judge
This appeal presents but a single question for decision, to wit, was the Board of General Appraisers in the present case authorized to permit the importer to amend its protest under the provisions of the tariff act of September 22, 1922, in view of the fact that the present importation was entered, the entry liquidated, and the original protest filed, all prior to the passage of that act, and more than 30 days prior to the date of the amendment?
The facts in the case are few and undisputed. The imported merchandise was entered for duty on April 26, 1922, and the entry was liquidated on August…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- In re Collector of CustomsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
- In re ShermanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1892
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woolworth Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- James Akeroyd & Son v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- United States v. B. Holman, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- May Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924