Woolworth Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hatfield, Judge,
delivered tlie opinion of the court:
Entry of imported merchandise was made on June 21, 1922. It was liquidated on February 5, 1923, and the importer filed a protest against the collector’s classification and assessment on March 29, 1923. On June 22, 1923, the collector reported as follows:
* * * The merchandise marked “A” was assessed at 35 per centum ad valo-rem under paragraph 342, act of 1913.
Prom the appraiser’s special report herewith and the amended return on the invoice, the merchandise appears to be properly dutiable at 20 per centum under paragraph 63 of said act.
Howeve…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Scaramelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Washington Home for Incurables v. American Security & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Taylor v. Midland Valley R.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James Akeroyd & Son v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- United States v. B. Holman, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Eurasia Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Griffon Importing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.