Legal Opinion

James Akeroyd & Son v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 27, 1931No. 3415PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

The merchandise involved herein consists of New Zealand wool, entered at the port of Philadelphia by appellant on June 22, 1922.

On October 26, 1922, liquidation took place, the wool being classified and assessed for duty at 45 cents per pound under the provisions of paragraph 18 of the Emergency Tariff Act of 1921. On December 18, 1922, appellant filed with the collector a protest against the liquidation at 45 cents per pound, claiming the merchandise to be dutiable at 30 cents per pound, as washed wool, under the provisions of said paragraph 18 of the Emergency Tariff Act of 1921.

On May 23,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Finn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Auffmordt v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Brown & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wally Packaging, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API