Legal Opinion

State v. Green

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1983No. 822SC1074PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in admitting evidence of, and instructing the jury regarding, an argument between defendant and the victim which occurred several days prior to the homicide. This evidence was admissible to show defendant’s motive and mental intent or state, and to indicate the relationship between defendant and the victim. See State v. Cherry, 298 N.C. 86, 109, 257 S.E. 2d 551, 565 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 941, 100 S.Ct. 2165, 64 L.Ed. 2d 796 (1980); State v. Bailey, 49 N.C. App. 377, 380-82, 271 S.E. 2d 752, 754-55 (1980), disc. rev. denied, 301 N.C.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. RoseboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. RiversCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. JewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API