Legal Opinion

State v. Price

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1980No. 44PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motion challenging the jury pool on the ground that blacks as well as young people between the ages of 18 and 29 were underrepresented in the pool. He argues that he was denied due process of law. There was no error in the denial of the motion.

At the hearing on the motion, defendant presented the testimony of Mr. James O’Reilly, a doctoral candidate in the field of sociology with an emphasis in demography at Duke University. Mr. O’Reilly conducted studies on the demographics…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Peters v. KiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. AdcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API