Legal Opinion

Buck v. Arndt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1943No. Appeal, 187PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.,

This appeal presents the single question whether there was an accident within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

The referee’s findings of fact were unchallenged throughout. They are clear and concise and establish that:

“4. On January 19, 1942, Norman Buck, the claimant, was in the employ of Milton H. Arndt, the defendant, as a carpenter, and on that morning was engaged in his usual work, helping to build a porch on a house. He was carrying a 2 x 4 rail, which was about 16 feet long, on one of his shoulders. When he was about to put down the rail, he lifted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Harring v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gavula v. Sims Company.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Gray's Hatchery & Poultry Farms, Inc. v. StevensSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  3. Pudlosky v. Follmer Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Lemmon v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API