Apker v. Crown Can Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
November 13, 1942:
I concur in the conclusion that under the facts of this case the board correctly held there was no evidence of 'an “accident” within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. It is also true that the presence of pain does not in and of itself show an injury by accident at the time the pain is felt.
I do not agree, however, with the unqualified statement that specific earlier cases in this court, such as Betts v. American Stores Co. et al., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 452, 161 A. 589, Cowell v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 119 Pa. Superior Ct. 185, 180 A.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Betts v. American Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Harring v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.