Legal Opinion
Belgium v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 7, 2009No. 2008-1213, 2008-1214PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge PROST.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
The Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) issued liquidation instructions requiring that certain steel imported by Plaintiff-Appellees Ugine and ALZ Belgium, Arcelor Stainless USA, LLC and Arcelor Trading USA, LLC (together “Arcelor”), be treated as Belgian instead of German in origin and subject to antidump-ing and countervailing duties. The Court of International Trade held that the liquidation instructions issued by Commerce were contrary to law. After Commerce adopted new…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Shinyei Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- American Signature, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Weishan Hongda Aquatic Food Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Royal United Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- AMS Assocites, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Bell Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.