Legal Opinion
Royal United Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 25, 2010No. Slip Op. 10-71; Court 09-00351PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
In this matter, Plaintiff, an importer of axes/adzes from the People’s Republic of China (“China” or “PRC”), seeks re-liquidation of two of its entries at the cash deposit rate, rather than at the assessment rate determined by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) in its periodic administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering Plaintiffs entries. Plaintiff, however, did not participate in that administrative review proceeding, despite constructive notice of the opportunity to do so. Because of Plaintiffs failure to so participate, and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Richard James Booth v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Suntec Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Alden Leeds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Michaels Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- C.B. Imports Transamerica Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.