Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. E. Clemens Horst Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1917No. Civ. No. 1731PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order denying a new trial. John F. Ellison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. P. Andrews, W. A. Fish, A. H. Jarman, Gavin McNab, Edward C. Harrison, and Maurice E. Harrison, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff had the verdict in an action for damages resulting from personal injuries. The accident was caused by her dress being caught by a revolving iron shaft while she was engaged at work on a hop-picking machine, and she was seriously hurt. We attach hereto a diagram to illustrate the situation and to make clearer the testimony to which we shall refer. "A" represents the platform on which plaintiff stood, "B" the shaft on which her dress was caught, "C" the south post close to or against which she stood when her clothing came into contact with the shaft, "D" the grate with its iron bars…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Medlin v. SpazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Scragg v. SalleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. People v. PlylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Wallace v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Huber v. Henry J. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Burns v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Gargir v. B'nei AkivaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API