Legal Opinion

Texas Central Railway Co. v. Stuart

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1892No. 3PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Eastland. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Moore, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

On the 19th day of January, 1883, Sallie G. Stuart, then a minor about three years of age, with her mother and younger sister, were passengers in a regular passenger train of plaintiff in error, going from Cisco to section house No. 19 on its line of railroad in this State. At the town of Corban, a station on said railroad a short distance from defendant in error's destination, the train upon which she was riding was stopped and the locomotive detached therefrom and sent off on other business. When the locomotive was again coupled to the cars this was done so negligently as to cause a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Galveston City Railroad v. HewittTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StyronTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. G., H. & H. R'y Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. McBride v. BangussTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Brooke v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cleburne St. Ry. Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Clowe & Cowan, Inc. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. I. G. N. R. R. Co. v. SlusherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. DurbinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API