McBride v. Banguss
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Cass. Tried below before the Hon. W. P. McLean. The opinion states the case. Among other things, appellants claim in their fifth assignment of error that the court erred in charging the jury, “the proof must show that the whole of the purchase money for the land was paid with the defendant’s (B. A. Banguss) money to entitle plaintiff to recover.”
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
This is an action brought by C. McBride and F. M. Henry against B. A. Banguss, James A. Banguss, J. E. D. Blades, C. B. Mooring and Thomas L. Lyon, the last two of whom comprised the firm of Mooring & Lyon, to recover the land in controversy. The action is one in form of trespass to try title, in which the petition sets out the title of the plaintiffs and defendants, as claimed by the former. It is alleged that the appellant, McBride, as the administrator of the estate of Davis, obtained a judgment against B. A. Banguss under which the land in controversy was sold,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McKamey v. ThorpTexas Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by25 opinions
- McClintic v. Midland Grocery & Dry Goods Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
- Kischman v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Armstrong v. TurbevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- De Leon v. AldreteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. BrothersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.