Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Henry

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 15, 1916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Couet by

Judge Cakroll

— Affirming.

Tliis is the second appeal of this case by the railway company. The former opinion may be found in 158 Ky., 88, and as the facts are very fully stated in that opinion, it is not necessary to repeat them here, especially as the evidence on the trial from which this appeal is prosecuted was substantially the same as the evidence on the trial from which the former appeal was taken.

The grounds relied on for reversal of the judgment, which was for $12,600.00, are: That the verdict of the jury is not supported by sufficient evidence; that the court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Blue Grass Traction Co. v. InglesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Dupoyster v. Ft. Jefferson Imp. Co.'s ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Stewart's Admr v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Powell v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. McDaniel v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Skinner's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Consolidation Coal Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Nussbaum v. CaskeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API