Legal Opinion
Berry v. Keith
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1953No. 1388PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
This case was previously before us in Keith v. Berry, D.C.Mun.App., 64 A.2d 300. It involves an action by Mrs. Keith to recover $515 allegedly deposited with appellant toward the purchase of a house.. On the previous appeal, we reversed and awarded a new trial to Mrs. Keith.
The. evidence adduced at the’ second trial was as follows: Mrs. Keith testified that she gave Berry, a real estate broker, $865 over a period of months, and made 19 payments in all. It was understood between the parties that this money was to be held by Berry until such time as he could find a house…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shokuwan Shimabukuro v. Higeyoshi NagayamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Keith v. BerryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Fowler v. StanfordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Conover v. HalleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- H. H. Butler Stores, Inc. v. BarronDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chasanow v. WillcoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Killeen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Porter v. Berwyn Fuel & Feed Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Hamilton v. BlankenshipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961