Legal Opinion
Keith v. Berry
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1949No. 755PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
Appellant sued appellee, a licensed real estate broker, claiming $515, representing the unpaid balance of $865 allegedly deposited with the broker to be applied toward the purchase of a house. The bonding company was named as codefendant on the basis of a bond indemnifying customers of the broker under the Real Estate and Business Brokers’ License Act.1 The trial court found that appellant had advanced only $605 and that she had been repaid $350. The trial court also held that the ■balance of $255 had been properly expended for her account and hence that appellee owed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jay v. General Realties Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Libby v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Cutler v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
- Fox v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Urban Investments, Inc. v. BranhamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Aronoff v. Lenkin Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Everett A. R. Searl, Pearl A. Searl v. Donald M. EarllCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Evans v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Berry v. KeithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.