Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Blankenship
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 15, 1961No. 2780PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
This was a suit by appellant to compel the repayment of $1,606, the total of ten loans allegedly advanced to appellee during the summer of 1958. At trial appellant was unable to recount from memory the amount and circumstances of each loan transaction but relied upon ten slips of paper which recited the dates of the loans, their amounts, and the name of their recipient, Thomas W. Blankenship. These memoranda, appellant testified, had been prepared by him at the time of the loans. With some reservation, the court admitted the slips in evidence over appellee’s objection…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Shokuwan Shimabukuro v. Higeyoshi NagayamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Carow v. BishopDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Rieffer v. HollingsworthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Taylor v. United Broadcasting Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Warner Corporation v. Magazine Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Keefer v. Keefer and Johnson, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hamilton v. BlankenshipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ramos v. RamosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972