Legal Opinion
Killeen v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 28, 1966No. 3949-3951PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge:
Appellants, the president and the treasurer of a corporation operating a local restaurant, were convicted of keeping a disorderly house 1 and vagrancy. 2 The former charge was tried before a jury; the latter submitted to the court. On appeal, they contend that the trial court erred (1) in failing to grant a motion for a verdict of not guilty, (2) in certain of its charges to the jury, and (3) in the admission of certain evidence. Since the vagrancy conviction must necessarily stand or fall with that of keeping a disorderly house, only the latter will be discussed.
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Shokuwan Shimabukuro v. Higeyoshi NagayamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hawthorne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- United States v. WadeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Fistere, Inc. v. HelzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Raleigh v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.