Legal Opinion

South v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1986No. H001734PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AGLIANO, P. J.

Petitioner/defendant Torey T. South (South) seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent court to appoint an attorney to represent him at public expense. We conclude relief is not merited and deny the petition.

Facts

On December 27, 1984, South, a soldier in the United States Army, was charged with armed robbery. Thereafter, the municipal court referred him to the Santa Clara County Public Defender’s office for possible representation, but his application was denied because his income exceeded the eligibility standard set by the county. Thereafter, South retained an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API