Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1977No. Crim. 9186PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*570Opinion

GARDNER, P. J.

In this case we explore the responsibilities of the trial court in making an adequate record that a criminal defendant “voluntarily and intelligently” elects to represent himself under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 [45 L.Ed.2d 562, 95 S.Ct. 2525].

Defendant pleaded guilty to possession of heroin. Criminal proceedings were suspended and he was committed to CRC. Criminal proceedings were then reinstituted and he was sentenced to prison.

On appeal, defendant contends (1) that the sentence to prison violated the terms of his plea bargain, and (2) that the record does not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. LawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. RiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. TeronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Maxwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API