Legal Opinion
Babbitt Ford, Inc. v. Navajo Indian Tribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1983No. Nos. 81-6054, 82-5002 and 81-6052PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated appeals, Babbitt Ford, Inc. (Babbitt), and Gurley Motor Company (Gurley), seek reversal of an order of the district court denying declaratory and injunctive relief from enforcement of certain of the Navajo Tribe’s (the Tribe) *590vehicle repossession regulations. In their cross-appeal, Tim and Lorraine Sellers (Sellers) and Barney and Alice Joe (Joes) seek reversal of that portion of the district court’s order enjoining the enforcement of the liquidated damages provision of the Navajo Tribe’s regulation. We are asked to decide whether the Tribe has the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- R.J. Williams Company, Richard J. Williams and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Fort Belknap Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- James R. Smith v. Salish Kootenai College Court of Appeals of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Hardin v. White Mountain Apache TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Attorney's Process & Investigation Services, Inc. v. Sac & Fox TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States of America Ex Rel. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Frank RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.