Legal Opinion

Eagle v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 17, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing.

The appellant, Claud Eagle, at his trial in the Whitley circuit court under an indictment accusing him of unlawfully, willfully and feloniously breaking and entering into the wholesale grocery house of Lanham & Terrell, was found guilty and given the minimum punishment prescribed by law. His motion for a new trial was overruled, and from the judgment pronounced on the verdict he prosecutes this appeal and urges by his counsel a number of alleged errors that are claimed to be sufficiently prejudicial to authorize a reversal of the judgment. They…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clary v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Music v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Hickey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Kirby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  5. Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alsbrook v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Canada v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Wallace v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Alford v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Butler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API