Legal Opinion

J. O. Nessen Lumber Co. v. Ray H. Bennett Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1923No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff began suit in the Baraga circuit court against the principal defendant and secured service of process on the garnishee defendant. All are foreign corporations. The principal defendant was not served. It filed a plea of the general issue and moved to dismiss, claiming that the garnishee had no property of the principal defendant “in its hands and under its custody and control” as stated in the affidavit on which the writ of garnishment issued. Proofs were taken and the motion denied. The facts were stipulated and are as follows:

*351On September 26, 1919, the Bennett Company-entered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ruhl v. A. Ruoff Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Isaac Van Dyke Co. v. MollMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Koury v. Providence-Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
  3. National Fire Ins. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Zabonick v. RalstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Peoples State Bank v. RecklingMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API