Baker v. Parkhurst
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Manistee; McMahon, J. Garnishment proceedings by William E. Baker against L. K. Parkhurst, J. W. Parkhurst, and James M. Reed, composing the firm of L. K. Parkhurst & Co., as garnishees of Thomas R. Welsh. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The plaintiff resides in Manistee, and is engaged in the lumber business. In April and May, 1897, Welsh, the principal defendant, lived at Reed City, and owned a mill plant, machinery, lumber, etc. During said months he purchased lumber from the plaintiff on credit. He also during this time purchased lumber on credit from the R. G. Peters Salt & Lumber Company. These debts *543not being paid by Welsh, suits were commenced against him by these firms, and judgments obtained thereon in both cases. Garnishee proceedings were also commenced in both cases against L. K. Parkhurst & Co., who were then…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fearey v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Heineman v. SchlossMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Brown v. BrabbMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Buhl Iron Works v. TeutonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Folkerts v. StandishMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Peter Schuttler Co. v. GuntherMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- In re HuxollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Grinnell Brothers v. MoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Crusoe Bros. v. KudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.