Legal Opinion

Chovin v. Miranda

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1936No. Civ. 9969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

Respondent Leona Isabel Chovin recovered a judgment against appellant Joaquin P. Miranda and her husband, Arnold Chovin, individually and as copartners for the unpaid balance of rent reserved in a written lease. The lease demised a garage to the copartners for a term of ten years at a total rental of $48,000 payable in monthly instalments of $400 each. It acknowledged the receipt, as security, of $1600, which was to be applied in payment of the rent accruing during the last four months of the term and upon which respondent agreed to pay interest at the rate of 4 per cent per…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stetson v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Oneto v. RestanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Davidson v. EllmakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Feigenbaum v. AymardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Jarrett v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaneko v. OkudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Kreling v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Handley v. GuascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Robinson v. HerringArizona Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API